To call for no war makes sense and to call for no terrorism or small guerrilla warfare also makes sense because small warfare always leads to bigger warfare which could be seen as its major purpose. Terrorism might bring welcome change if small groups of warring terrorists want to take down bigger war making wealthy powerful individuals. Although in the bigger picture, war makes no moral sense it simultaneously makes great amoral business sense. Arms dealers make millions off arming well paid terrorism cells and entrepreneurial political gangsters' personal armies, who purchase big ticket arms that when anonymously utilized, will help them gain enough votes to remain in power or seize new larger powers over nations and people. War and terrorism are huge moneymakers for individuals within political movements claiming to wage war for their constituents' freedom. The profits on the most effective arms are so high that arms dealers invest in setting off wars by deeply funding terrorism all over the world even if it's only religious persecution for profit. War seems simply wrong. But in a more complex way it is natural tool enabling a food chain of enormous human greed and envy. War is always necessary to help feed the greed and envy on display from powerful political individuals of every stripe all over the political spectrum. Corruption and big money always taint the purest of philosophical political aims. Peace is obtained briefly only when politicians are not allowed to make huge amounts of money off the death and misery of others. It may seem cynical but most politicians don't mind a "good" war if there is a lot of money to be made. You may not agree but it would not be the worst thing if you could prove me wrong.
To call for no war makes sense and to call for no terrorism or small guerrilla warfare also makes sense because small warfare always leads to bigger warfare which could be seen as its major purpose. Terrorism might bring welcome change if small groups of warring terrorists want to take down bigger war making wealthy powerful individuals. Although in the bigger picture, war makes no moral sense it simultaneously makes great amoral business sense. Arms dealers make millions off arming well paid terrorism cells and entrepreneurial political gangsters' personal armies, who purchase big ticket arms that when anonymously utilized, will help them gain enough votes to remain in power or seize new larger powers over nations and people. War and terrorism are huge moneymakers for individuals within political movements claiming to wage war for their constituents' freedom. The profits on the most effective arms are so high that arms dealers invest in setting off wars by deeply funding terrorism all over the world even if it's only religious persecution for profit. War seems simply wrong. But in a more complex way it is natural tool enabling a food chain of enormous human greed and envy. War is always necessary to help feed the greed and envy on display from powerful political individuals of every stripe all over the political spectrum. Corruption and big money always taint the purest of philosophical political aims. Peace is obtained briefly only when politicians are not allowed to make huge amounts of money off the death and misery of others. It may seem cynical but most politicians don't mind a "good" war if there is a lot of money to be made. You may not agree but it would not be the worst thing if you could prove me wrong.